What would be easiest? x_X;
- blackmageheart
- Rank 12 - Yoshi Mario

- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:47 am
- Contact:
Re: What would be easiest? x_X;
If you would rather go for a larger count on your fabric, may I suggest 18ct and 3 strands? I've done work on a very dark blue background (it was either 16 or 18ct) and I used 3 strands, I tried 2 and the background did sorta poke through with some colours. So, I would suggest using at least 3 strands. Efrite's right though - a swatch to test with would be best, as it will be you who does the work and you who has to be happy with how it goes 
RMDC wrote:...I've been stitching at an estimated rate of almost a full BMH per day...
-
residentgeek
- Rank 2 - Fire Mario

- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:42 am
- Contact:
Re: What would be easiest? x_X;
On 22ct fabric I've used 3 strands and it's almost too much. It does get really good coverage though. I would definitely use at least 3 strands on 14 or 18 count. Maybe even more on 14ct if I wanted complete coverage.
- Wolfix
- Rank 3 - Star Mario

- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:09 am
Re: What would be easiest? x_X;
You could vary the number of threads or use half-stitches for the dark parts that are inside the image - you'd get a more interesting profile that way. One of the best things about cross stitch is that it's 3D and not enough pattern-makers make use of varied stitches and numbers of threads, in my opinion.
Fish, fish, my only wish!